SDXL vs Stable Diffusion 3 vs SD 1.5: which one should you use?

By Updated 3 min read

Use Stable Diffusion 1.5 for speed, low VRAM and a huge choice of community models; SDXL 1.0 for detailed 1024×1024 images and artist styles; Stable Diffusion 3.5 for prompts with several subjects, readable text and the best quality if your GPU has 12 GB or more.

Comparison table

SD 1.5SDXL 1.0SD 3 MediumSD 3.5 Large
ReleaseOct 2022Jul 2023Jun 2024Oct 2024
Parameters0.9 B2.6 B (+ refiner)2 B8 B
Native size512×5121024×10241024×10241024×1024
VRAM (fp16)4–6 GB8 GB10 GB19 GB (11 GB in fp8)
Speed (our 12 GB GPU)~4 s~20 s——
Prompt understandingkeywordskeywords, better compositionsentences, several subjectsbest
Text in imagesnorarelyyes, shortyes
Artist namesstrongstrongweakerweaker
Community modelsvery manythe most, with Pony and Illustriousfewfew
LicenceOpenRAIL-MOpenRAIL++Community licence (free under $1M revenue)
Try on this siteSD 1.5SDXLSD 3—

Stable Diffusion 1.5: the workhorse

Small, fast, endlessly customised. Photorealistic and anime fine-tunes, ControlNet models, LoRAs and embeddings exist for everything. Its weaknesses are the 512 px base resolution, hands, and a literal reading of prompts. It remains the right choice for a 6 GB card, for AnimateDiff animation and for ControlNet-heavy work. The members' txt2img page on this site runs a custom SD 1.5 model.

SDXL 1.0: detail and style

SDXL has four times the pixels, a second text encoder and a refiner for the last steps. Faces, hands and composition improved a lot, and artist names have a strong, predictable effect, which is why our 1,731-artist comparison was generated with SDXL. It needs 8 GB and is several times slower than 1.5: about 20 s against 4 s per image on our GPU. Distilled versions (SDXL Turbo, LCM LoRA) need only one to eight steps instead of 25 to 30, at some quality cost.

Stable Diffusion 3 and 3.5: understanding and text

A new architecture (diffusion transformer with three text encoders) that follows sentences instead of keyword lists: most of the time "a red cube on a blue sphere, to the left of a green cone" comes out right and short text in quotes is readable. 3 Medium had anatomy problems that 3.5 reduced; 3.5 Large is the most capable of the family, 3.5 Medium the balanced one. Artist names and old negative prompt habits matter less. Try Stable Diffusion 3 Medium here.

Which one should you pick?

  • Learning, 6 GB card, ControlNet, AnimateDiff: SD 1.5.
  • Illustration, portraits, artist styles, 8–12 GB: SDXL.
  • Posters with text, complex scenes, 12–16 GB+: SD 3.5 Medium or Large.
  • No GPU: the online tools on this site, no account needed.

Questions people also ask

Is SDXL better than SD 1.5?

Out of the box, yes: higher resolution, better anatomy and composition. SD 1.5 keeps the edge in speed and VRAM, and still has a huge library of community fine-tunes.

Can I use SD 1.5 LoRAs with SDXL or SD 3?

No. A LoRA is tied to the architecture it was trained on; each family needs its own LoRAs.

What about Flux?

Flux.1 by Black Forest Labs (August 2024) is a 12-billion-parameter competitor with excellent prompt adherence and text; Flux.2 arrived in November 2025. Neither is a Stable Diffusion model. ComfyUI runs both and Forge runs Flux.1, whose full checkpoint is 24 GB; quantised versions fit 6 to 12 GB cards.